Clinical Research

HOME > R&D Achievement > Clinical Research > Article
 
DATE : 16-03-14 14:04
Comparison of paclitaxel-, sirolimus-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome.
 WRITER : stent
HIT : 2,398  
   C111._Circ_J._2011;75_9_2120-2127..pdf (1.3M) [0] DATE : 2016-03-14 14:04:34
C111. Lee MG, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Cho JG, Park JC, Kang JC, Chae SC, Hur SH, Hong TJ, Kim YJ, Seong IW, Chae JK, Rhew JY, Chae IH, Cho MC, Bae JH, Rha SW, Kim CJ, Choi D, Jang YS, Yoon J, Chung WS, Seung KB, Park SJ; Comparison of paclitaxel-, sirolimus-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome. Circ J. 2011;75(9)2120-2127.

(Abstract)
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with metabolic syndrome (MS).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR; November 2005-December 2007), a total of 1,768 MS patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were enrolled: The PES group was 634, SES group, 906, and ZES group, 228. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (all-cause death, re-myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) during 12 months follow-up. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of primary endpoint in the PES, SES, and ZES groups was 10.9%, 9.1%, and 11.0%, respectively (P=0.086). Incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization did not differ among the 3 groups. There were 7 episodes of acute (0.3% in PES group, 0.4% in SES group, and 0.4% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.773) and 18 episodes of cumulative stent thrombosis including late stent thrombosis (0.9% in PES group, 1.0% in SES group, and 1.3% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.448).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of SES, PES, and ZES in MS patients with STEMI