임상

HOME > 연구실적 > 임상 > 논문
 
작성일 : 16-03-13 20:33
논문번호 25
논문제목(영문) Acute and long-term outcomes after coronary stenting of CrossFlex, GFX, and NIR stents.
국내외구분 국내 SCI여부 SCI(E)
연구책임자역할 교신저자
주저자명 Lee SH
교신저자명 Jeong MH
공동저자명 Lee SH, Jeong MH, Kim W, Kim KH, Kang KT, Rhew JY, Park JC, Ahn Y, Cho JG, Ahn BH, Park JC, Kim SH, Kang JC;
게제년월일 2001-10-31
ISSN 1738-5520
Impact Factor 0.753
학술지명 Korean Circulation J
서지사항 0집 / 31권 / 10호,   페이지(1004 - 1012)
요약초록문
(Abstract) 입력		 Background and Objectives
New coronary stents are displacing for the broader array of lesions, but disagreement remains which device is more advantageous and whether design determines outcomes. The present study investigates the impact of stent design on early and one year outcomes.

Materials and Methods
A retrospective analysis of 350 patients with 378 lesions (60±10 years, 265 male), that underwent 181 CrossFlex, 95 GFX, 102 NIR coronary stentings at Chonnam National University Hospital from January 1996 to December 1999, was performed. Early procedural success rates, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within one year and follow-up angiographic findings in 227 patients (240 lesions, follow-up duration=8.1±5.9 months) were compared among three groups.

Results
1) There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics except the lesion length (CrossFlex: GFX: NIR=11.5±5.2: 14.5±6.7: 13.9±5.7 mm, p<0.05). 2) There were no significant differences in early angiographic success rates among three groups (CrossFlex: 98.9%, GFX: 100.0%, NIR: 99.0%). 3) There were no significant differences in late luminal loss (CrossFlex: GFX: NIR=1.03±0.69: 1.11±0.75: 1.09±0.70 mm, p=NS), restenosis rates (CrossFlex: 30.6%, GFX: 30.8%, NIR: 28.4%, p=NS) and MACE (CrossFlex: GFX: NIR=27.6%: 29.5%: 27.5%, p=NS) among three groups.

Conclusion
Despite different lesions length, the early and late angiographic outcomes, and MACE within one year were not different among three different types of coronary stents.
파일  C25.+Korean+Circulation+J+2001;31(10)1004-1012..pdf (311.2K) DATE : 2021-05-21 15:09:45