임상

HOME > 연구실적 > 임상 > 논문
 
작성일 : 16-03-14 02:07
논문번호 150
논문제목(영문) Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents.
국내외구분 국외 SCI여부 SCI(E)
연구책임자역할 공저자
주저자명 Koh YS
교신저자명 Seung KB
공동저자명 Koh YS, Kim PJ, Chang K, Park HJ, Jeong MH, Kim HS, Jang Y, Gwon HC, Park SJ, Seung KB;
게제년월일 2015-08-17
ISSN 0896-4327
Impact Factor 1.183
학술지명 Journal of interventional cardiology
서지사항 0집 / 26권 / 3호,   페이지(245 - 253)
요약초록문
(Abstract) 입력		 Abstract: BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) between the one-stent technique (stenting only the main branch) and the two-stent technique (stenting of both the main and side branches) for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era. Therefore, we investigated this issue using the large nationwide coronary bifurcation registry. METHODS: The 1,147 patients with non-left main coronary true bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the Korea Coronary Bifurcation Stent (COBIS) registry. All patients were stratified based on the stent placement technique: one stent (n = 898) versus two stents (n = 249). MACE, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR), were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 20 months. The MACEs did not differ between the 2 groups. Findings from the one-stent group were similar to those of the two-stent group in composite of death, MI, or TVR, based on analysis by crude, multivariate Cox hazard regression model, inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (hazard ratio [HR] 0.911, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.614-1.351; HR 0.685 95% CI 0.381-1.232; HR 1.235, 95% CI 0.331-4.605, respectively). In further analysis with propensity score matching, the overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study indicate that the one-stent technique was not inferior to the two-stent technique for the treatment of non-left main true coronary bifurcation lesions in terms of long-term MACEs.
파일  C150.+J+Interv+Cardiol.+2013;26(3)245-253..pdf (390.4K) DATE : 2021-05-26 09:59:42